100 people - 70 computers? I think most companies I have worked for have
     about 1.1 -1.2 computers per person once you round up all the spare/test

Some places I have worked are very very tight on getting new PC's and support !
One place I started at - 3 weeks before I got my own PC and another 3 before I
got it working properly 300 people and No support to speak of !!! hence I left
shortly after...

Paul
____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject:  RE: [DUG-OFFTOPIC]:  Resourcing IT...
Author:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:          19/03/2001 15:04



     > What I am wondering is what would the average sort of IT team
     > size be for an organisation of say 100 employees. Now I know this all
     > depends on lots of factors...
     When you talk about IT staff, are you talking about IT support and
     application development staff?

     > A couple of details are as follows... we are a very technical oriented
     > company... we have about 70 PCs running all kinds of software... so,
     > obviously some staff's responsibility is on keeping everything running
     and
     > on general IT support.
     100 people - 70 computers? I think most companies I have worked for have
     about 1.1 -1.2 computers per person once you round up all the spare/test
     machines and other odd boxes, (have worked in one place with about 2.5
     computers per person which was nice).

     > Also, we mostly develop in house software applications... and there is
     > always things to do!! To date we have not outsourced much (if any)
     > development work
     Outsourcing development work seems difficult if you are talking about
     requiring industry specific knowledge. I would be tempted to outsource IT
     support and other aspects & keep at least design & testing in house.  I
     figure the development team size has to be scaled according to demand and
     cost-benefits. If users, (in-house or not), are screaming for bug fixes and
     have budget to pay for the work then you need more staff (or work smarter
     of
     course).

     > Just wondering if anyone could guess (or comment on other similar
     > organisations) at the number of IT staff we would typically require.
     I know that if everyone kept a log of every hour spent doing support issues
     (I just spent a morning tracking down why a HP laser printer was just
     spewing out pages at a client site), then the number of hours required to
     maintain 70+ workstations/servers would be 'significant'.  I would guess at
     least one full-time support person with support from consultants (such as
     LanCom or CSC etc) and/or part-timers.

     Grant

(See attached file: att1.htm)
 (See attached file: att2.eml)
Title: RE: [DUG-OFFTOPIC]: Resourcing IT...

> What I am wondering is what would the average sort of IT team
> size be for an organisation of say 100 employees. Now I know this all
> depends on lots of factors...
When you talk about IT staff, are you talking about IT support and application development staff?
 
> A couple of details are as follows... we are a very technical oriented
> company... we have about 70 PCs running all kinds of software... so,
> obviously some staff's responsibility is on keeping everything running and
> on general IT support.
100 people - 70 computers? I think most companies I have worked for have about 1.1 -1.2 computers per person once you round up all the spare/test machines and other odd boxes, (have worked in one place with about 2.5 computers per person which was nice).

 
> Also, we mostly develop in house software applications... and there is
> always things to do!! To date we have not outsourced much (if any)
> development work
Outsourcing development work seems difficult if you are talking about requiring industry specific knowledge. I would be tempted to outsource IT support and other aspects & keep at least design & testing in house.  I figure the development team size has to be scaled according to demand and cost-benefits. If users, (in-house or not), are screaming for bug fixes and have budget to pay for the work then you need more staff (or work smarter of course).

 
> Just wondering if anyone could guess (or comment on other similar
> organisations) at the number of IT staff we would typically require.
I know that if everyone kept a log of every hour spent doing support issues (I just spent a morning tracking down why a HP laser printer was just spewing out pages at a client site), then the number of hours required to maintain 70+ workstations/servers would be 'significant'.  I would guess at least one full-time support person with support from consultants (such as LanCom or CSC etc) and/or part-timers. 

Grant


att2.eml

Reply via email to