Hi Marcel,
On 12/21/2010 01:05 PM, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Denis,
>
>>> We could document this as Freerunner specific notes to point people into
>>> the right direction. And we should maybe to the same for IFX since that
>>> is currently only documented in the GIT commit logs.
>>
>> Documentation inside the individual modem driver is the way to go. And
>> IFX isn't even documented in git commit logs. I looked ;)
>
> commit 3443a7a177fbaca24c84658968aff0a55db8a51d
> Author: Marcel Holtmann <mar...@holtmann.org>
> Date: Sat Sep 18 22:08:41 2010 +0900
>
> udev: Add support for IFX device detection
>
> The IFX device detection is pretty static, but instead of using
> a static configuration file it is important to know when the device
> node is actually present. For this udev is perfect. Adding a simple
> udev rule is all that it takes:
>
> KERNEL=="ttyIFX[0-9]*", ENV{OFONO_DRIVER}="ifx"
>
> With this rule for every TTY with the kernel name like ttyIFX0, a new
> modem will be added and the IFX modem plugin driver requested for it.
>
> this is not enough?
Then I didn't look far back enough (or I'm simply blind). But I still
prefer this to be inside the driver or HACKING.calypso for easier access.
Regards,
-Denis
_______________________________________________
ofono mailing list
ofono@ofono.org
http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
