Hi Marcel, On 12/21/2010 01:05 PM, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi Denis, > >>> We could document this as Freerunner specific notes to point people into >>> the right direction. And we should maybe to the same for IFX since that >>> is currently only documented in the GIT commit logs. >> >> Documentation inside the individual modem driver is the way to go. And >> IFX isn't even documented in git commit logs. I looked ;) > > commit 3443a7a177fbaca24c84658968aff0a55db8a51d > Author: Marcel Holtmann <mar...@holtmann.org> > Date: Sat Sep 18 22:08:41 2010 +0900 > > udev: Add support for IFX device detection > > The IFX device detection is pretty static, but instead of using > a static configuration file it is important to know when the device > node is actually present. For this udev is perfect. Adding a simple > udev rule is all that it takes: > > KERNEL=="ttyIFX[0-9]*", ENV{OFONO_DRIVER}="ifx" > > With this rule for every TTY with the kernel name like ttyIFX0, a new > modem will be added and the IFX modem plugin driver requested for it. > > this is not enough?
Then I didn't look far back enough (or I'm simply blind). But I still prefer this to be inside the driver or HACKING.calypso for easier access. Regards, -Denis _______________________________________________ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono