Hi Rémi, On 01/10/2011 06:41 AM, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > On Friday 07 January 2011 18:23:25 ext Denis Kenzior, you wrote: >> Hi Rémi, >> >> On 01/07/2011 10:02 AM, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: >>> --- >>> >>> doc/connman-api.txt | 10 ++++++++++ >>> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/doc/connman-api.txt b/doc/connman-api.txt >>> index b13efd1..18185d7 100644 >>> --- a/doc/connman-api.txt >>> +++ b/doc/connman-api.txt >>> @@ -150,6 +150,16 @@ Properties boolean Active [readwrite] >>> >>> Holds whether the context is activated. This value >>> can be set to activate / deactivate the context. >>> >>> + string Bearer [readonly, optional] >>> + >>> + Contains the current packet switched bearer of the >>> + connection context. >>> + >>> + Possible values are the same as for the Technology >>> + property the NetworkRegistration object, plus >>> + "none" if no data activity is ongoing, or "unknown" >>> + if not known. >>> + >> >> Please remove this "unknown" bit. The property is already optional, so >> if it is never reported by the driver we shouldn't report it up, even if >> the context is active. > > That would not work. We need some default value otherwise we cannot signal > the > change from known to unknown, at least not with the oFono property change > interface. >
When do you think that will ever happen? Regards, -Denis _______________________________________________ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
