On May 27, 2009, at 19:20, Elaine Ashton wrote: > Perhaps the OGB should consider appointing an archivist, preferrably > someone with some interest and experience in archiving to help shape > the policy.
I've not seen anything so far to persuade me that the OGB ought to intervene. Archiving historical work should be a routine part of the work of the Website Community Group, and un-doing the un-used (a different job to archiving what is no longer current) sounds non- controversial. Is there a reason this is being referred to the OGB rather than just handled where it belongs in the Website CG? Thanks S.
