On 02/11/2007, Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith at sun.com> wrote: > If this is indeed solely about Indiana, I'd suggest a better course of > action is to: > > 1) Inform all three of Indiana's sponsoring communities about the release > plans requirement of the constitution. > > 2) Make sure this is covered in the community guidelines we're drafting > and hurry up finishing and disseminating those. > > 3) Remove the Release Timeline diagram and information from the front > page of http://opensolaris.org/ until either Project Indiana complies > with the constitutional requirements or a constitutional amendment to > change those requirements is put forth and adopted.
The interesting thing about all of this is that the OGB and community has no control over the trademark. So exactly what rules have they violated? At most, you could accuse them of causing community dissension or vaguely interpreting the trademark to be included ine some of the powers of the constitution which it is clearly not. -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses of all junction types--in the absence of quantum computing the combinatorics are not in our favor..." --Larry Wall
