Glynn Foster wrote:
>
> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> 1) Inform all three of Indiana's sponsoring communities about the release
>> plans requirement of the constitution.
>
> Awesome, yet another way of slowing down getting software to our users.
> Anything
> else we can do to get in the way?
If we accept Roy's reading of the constitution, this is the same as the Go/No-Go
vote that was held internally before deciding to release, similar to the one
held for every milestone release of Solaris (including SXDE, but not CE), you'd
just hold it on a opensolaris.org mailing list instead.
Three people sending +1's doesn't seem to take that much time - if it's too much
burden, then propose a constitutional amendment to make it a single +1 from the
project's benevolent dictator.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
