Keith M Wesolowski <keith.wesolowski at Sun.COM> writes: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:22:40AM +0000, Alan Burlison wrote: > >> out and do it properly. To take your example above, I can see no reason >> why the DTrace CG would choose to run its projects in another CG - there >> appears to be no real benefits in that approach. And if the ON CG dies >> (as it should), it wouldn't be an option anyway. > > Please tell us who is responsible for ON itself in that scheme. > Specifically, who will perform the functions the Sun C-teams performed > in the past, and by what authority will they do so?
The same people doing so now, in the same broken way they do now. Because nobody can get them to change. I'd have thought that was obvious. -- Rich
