On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 11:17:25PM -0400, brian.gupta at gmail.com wrote: > Although I don't agree with the requirement of a Sun Employee to have > final sayso on decisions, I would like to voice my support for this > project.
No such requirement imposed by the Constitution or OGB/2007/001. Are you trolling, or just referring to something else (most likely a broken process we haven't got round to fixing yet - and at this rate, never will)? If you're expressing concerns about the way consolidations are run, we have grounds for productive conversation. I, too, am very unhappy that the C-teams are operating as Sun entities and making decisions to suit Sun's business interests. Clearly, they need to be opened to participation and observation by all, and make decisions on a purely technical basis. If you would like to propose some guidelines for doing this, or have ideas about how consolidations ought to be represented in our Constitutional framework, please start a new thread on ogb-discuss and we can start to work through that. -- Keith M Wesolowski "Sir, we're surrounded!" FishWorks "Excellent; we can attack in any direction!"
