Keith M Wesolowski writes: > On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 11:17:25PM -0400, brian.gupta at gmail.com wrote: > > > Although I don't agree with the requirement of a Sun Employee to have > > final sayso on decisions, I would like to voice my support for this > > project. > > No such requirement imposed by the Constitution or OGB/2007/001. Are > you trolling, or just referring to something else (most likely a > broken process we haven't got round to fixing yet - and at this rate, > never will)?
Although I wouldn't claim to read Brian's mind, that looks to me like a clear reference to Ian's position within the Indiana project proposal (see subject line above ;-}) as "arbiter." I think it's a matter for the project leaders (if there are some proposed at some point in the future) and the sponsoring communities to address, if it concerns them. I think that's also what you said at some earlier point in the thread ... -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
