On May 31, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Glynn Foster wrote: > 1.4 Involvement > > There is a strong intention for this to be a community grass roots > project, with open contribution. We hope for this project to be > consensus driven, though ultimately the project leads will need > to dictate direction if that proves unfeasible for delivering > a timely release. While many of those decisions can be made within > that specific project area, based on requirements, there may be a > real need for a technical committee (project leads) to be > the sole arbiter.
If this is an OpenSolaris activity, it will obey the Group voting procedures documented in the constitution. There is no such thing as a sole arbiter at OpenSolaris, period. ....Roy
