Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On May 31, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Brian Gupta wrote: > >>> If this is an OpenSolaris activity, it will obey the Group voting >>> procedures documented in the constitution. There is no such thing as >>> a sole arbiter at OpenSolaris, period. >> >> Check out the following text CNET article: http://tinyurl.com/ys7hb2 > > As I said, the proposal is obviously wrong. One of these days, Sun > marketing will stop trying to run this project from the peanut gallery, > but that doesn't change the fact that the proposal cannot be accepted > by OpenSolaris as written.
Technical committee or project leads. I don't actually mind so long as we have a way of making a decision, and moving on as I mentioned in a previous reply when mutual consensus can't be achieved. I expect those types of technical decisions to be made by the usual stakeholders who have the experience and technical ability to make an informed one. Let's move on. Glynn
