On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Simon Phipps wrote: > > On Oct 18, 2007, at 19:31, Stephen Lau wrote: > >> While OpenSolaris governance, for the most part is left up to the >> various Community Groups, something that is cross-community impacting, >> like Indiana taking on the OpenSolaris name is exactly the kind of >> issue >> that is a board issue. > > I disagree. It is a job for the Advocacy group, just as all the other > parts of OpenSolaris, upon which we are all reliant, are the > responsibility of the experts within their respective groups. >
I'm inclined, at first, to agree with those who argue it's a job for the OGB, but this is an interesting point of view I hadn't thought of. Could you expand on it please? The main question that comes to my mind is what if another CG doesn't agree with the advocacy CG's findings in this regard? Eric
