Keith M Wesolowski wrote: > The OGB has already taken a decision to solve that problem is a > different way. Which was to seed an editorial committee with the very people from the CGs and Projects that are A) doing the editorial work today, and B) who would form the CC list of this proposed community group. I fail to see any practical difference. The whole point is to harness the people who feel motivated to do the work and empower them to do it in some transparent and predictable way.
Declaring that you would never trust any CG to make decisions that impact the community website content is a telling statement - if you don't trust *me* with the responsibility, why should I in turn trust *you* or the OGB? Without mutual understanding and trust, a community or society can't exist. -John
