Alan Burlison wrote: > Glynn Foster wrote: > > >> Sorry, I didn't end up getting the minutes typed up this evening like I >> planned >> to. The mp3 is here if you want to hear what was discussed - >> >> http://dlc.sun.com/osol/ogb/audio-recordings/ogb-meeting-12-12-2007.mp3 >> >> In summary, the proposal was passed, but had significant changes from the one >> you originally posted - the most notable being the removal of the content >> section of the proposal which was to replace the website editorial committee >> proposal that was passed a few weeks ago. >> > > I'm sorry, but it is unacceptable that the proposal has been changed > without consulting the group/person who drafted it, and then approved by > the OGB. > > If the OGB wants changes, it needs to reject the proposal, providing the > reasoning for doing so, and a list of proposed amendments. Otherwise it > is effectively imposing terms on the proposed CG that the CG has had no > opportunity to discuss. > > +1, I agree fully.
cheers, steve -- stephen lau | stevel at opensolaris.org | www.whacked.net
