Joerg Schilling writes:
> James Carlson <james.d.carlson at Sun.COM> wrote:
> 
> > Alan Coopersmith writes:
> > > stopped the e-mail.    (Unless Joerg wants to propose disbanding the
> > > ARC or SFW communities, there's nothing the OGB can do - we can't
> > > override a community decision.)
> >
> > Agreed; that thread had no governance relevance at all, and the
> > continued cross-posting was just a distraction.
> 
> It of course is realted to gouvernance if something important miserably fails
> the way it does. It is the purpose of the OGB to help here.

Nonsense.  There's no "failure" here.  Instead, there's a properly-
considered ARC and project team decision with which you personally
don't agree.  If we jumped in to mediate every time someone felt he
wasn't getting his due, then I suspect that's pretty much all we'd
ever think about.

If you want to make an OGB matter of it, then (speaking as an
individual OGB member) I would like to see a specific request from you
specifying your dispute with the operation of this community group and
what action (or actions) you'd like the OGB to consider in response.

Forcing the ARC to adopt some new basis for making decisions doesn't
seem to me like the sort of thing that the OGB should do -- without
having community consensus that such a change is needed.  Complaint by
one member doesn't establish "consensus."

> ogb-discuss has already become a low s/n list because of the way problems
> are discussed here.

Thanks for contributing.

-- 
James Carlson, Solaris Networking              <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive        71.232W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.496N   Fax +1 781 442 1677

Reply via email to