Rich Teer wrote: > That's > not the intention; the intent is yea or nay proposed changes > authored by others (hence my mention of "rubber stamping".
Somewhere in all this my original idea of having this board
produce a set of editorial guidelines seems to have gotten
completely lost, and replaced with a brute force 100% review
requirement.
Rather than creating guidelines for the effective delegation
of authority and responsibility, we seem to be centralizing it.
This feels wrong.
-John
