Also... I like the idea of having more candidates on the list. This way the Core Contributors will feel like they were able to choose who they thought would be passionate about the OpenSolaris mission rather than to feel like their vote was forced and limited. Just my two cents there.
Matt Nawrocki OSUG Leader Pittsburgh, PA On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Valerie Bubb Fenwick < Valerie.Fenwick at sun.com> wrote: > On Sun, 28 Feb 2010, Peter Tribble wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Matthew Nawrocki >> <matthew.nawrocki at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Question... >>> Is there a cap on the amount of people that can be on the OGB? Or can >>> all >>> the nominees (in theory) get elected? Just curious. Thanks! >>> >> >> Minimum 3, maximum 7. We currently have 8 candidates who have >> accepted their nominations (and the possibility of more nominations and >> acceptances to come). >> >> Of course, with fewer than 7 candidates they could all be elected. That's >> not happened, and I'm not sure how we would deal with that - my reading >> is that we would still need to run the election so that there are enough >> votes >> cast to make it count. (Especially under the new constitution where the >> act >> of voting is used to decide whether quorum is reached.) >> > > Well, we'd still run the election in that case, because we are > trying to pass a new constitution as well. Of course, a contested > race is sure to bring out more voters, which will be essential > to meeting the majority for passing the new constitution. > > Valerie > -- > Sponsor me in the Breathe Easy Ride - 100 miles - June 26! > Money raised goes to the American Lung Association: > http://action.lungusa.org/goto/valerie -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/attachments/20100301/e3557001/attachment.html>
