> Glenn Frazier
>
> 1(d) does not say "entire work" anywhere. It does say, "...and means any
> work covered by this License...but specifically excludes Product
> Identity."
>
> 2 says "This License applies to any Open Game Content...."
>
> So combining the two, what it appears to say is (among other things)
>
> OGC = whatever is covered by the licence,
> and The Licence covers whatever is OGC.
>
> Rather circular. Neither statement really closes the door on the
> possibility
> of there being work not covered by the license, as far as I can tell.
Now THAT is an interesting observation. I was assuming that 'any work' was
referring to a document, but I can see how it might not.
> I think the question is in part whether or not the OGL is a licence that
> pertains to a Publication or to material WITHIN a Publication.
I agree. In 7 it uses the term 'work' to refer to an entire publication,
rather than to just OGC, and I was using that as a basis for the definition
of a 'work'. That may or may not be accurate.
-Brad
