In a message dated 10/1/00 8:49:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>>Please don't try and smear me with something that is a vague
>recollection. That isn't reasonable.<<
>
> It's not an attempt to smear you. If I wanted to do that, I'd tell the
>good folks just what the allegations were...
>
And thus you get mileage out of it that wasn't there before...
>
>>> I've offered to make your problem good, and then some.<<
>
> No, you haven't: I'm not the guy with the problem. You're thinking of
>someone else. I never had any dealings whatsoever with Crunchy Frog.
>
Well, I was away for two days, and responded to the original message
literally minutes before leaving...so I forgot which email address had the
problem. And if we've never had dealings, why are you involved?
>
>>>Let us please take this to email. Its not appropriate here.<<
>
> Then why did you respond to it here?
>
Because of statements made by you (who was not a party to the transaction,
nor has ever had one with me) that led people to believe something that I
feel is not true...unanswered allegations are as bad as if it was true.
If you have a problem with me, fine. But this is *not* the appropriate place.
I'm not perfect. No one is. But I fix what I am *allowed* to fix.
-Paul @ CFE/NSG
