Re: [ogf-d20-l] SRD Errata

[chatdemon]

> In the case of the latter, the GP value is far more important than the
> actual material used, and a DM should be able to easily substitute
anything
> they want of a similar value.

Is it allowed under the d20 license to put the phb listed spell component
back in? In some cases the components have a symbolic or metaphorical
relationship to the effect of the spell and I think some of the
'in-character' flavor of the spell might be lost if a substitution must be
made.

-cd