Hello, Lynn Fredricks wrote: > Why would I want to associate my own work with it if someone is misdirecting > traffic from the OGF official site to their own commercial ends? I think you are going to need to back up this statement. How is it for his own commercial ends? The link to his site is far from obvious, but yet the link to the .org site is extremely obvious and is the first one that you see on a casual glance. Just because he has a link, doesn't make it commercial. Have Fun, Darren
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20... Aeon
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [og... Tim Dugger
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [og... Lynn Fredricks
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [og... mythic rat
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] ... Infinite Possibilities
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20... Aaron Smalley
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [og... Nik
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [og... Lynn Fredricks
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [og... Martin L. Shoemaker
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [og... Lynn Fredricks
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [og... Infinite Possibilities
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [og... Grok
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [og... Tim Dugger
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [og... Lynn Fredricks
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [og... Grok
- [ogf-d20-l] In-laws for sale! Martin L. Shoemaker
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [og... Lynn Fredricks
- [ogf-d20-l] Hole in the D20SR... Martin L. Shoemaker
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [og... Doug Meerschaert
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [og... Mike Looney
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Brad Thompson
