I'm trying to understand this employee mistake scenario. Hypothetical: Lime-Green Ronin publishes Mercenaries of Seaport as 100 percent open text. The company intended to do this, but the only written documentation of this intent is the book itself.
One month later, an animation company offers to option the characters in the book for development as a TV series. Lime-Green Ronin announces on its Web site that an employee mistakenly put the "100 percent open text" declaration in Mercenaries of Seaport. The company only intended to open Appendix III, paragraph 5 and the stat block and combat description of the spam golem. How would third-party reusers be safe from this situation? It's not like most companies are chatty enough to clarify their intent for any of their work. -- Rogers Cadenhead, [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/14/2003 Weblog: http://www.cadenhead.org/workbench _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
