First, an issue that is incredibly minor, and I think I know the answer... If I draw from a source using version 1.0 of the license, need I list it alongside 1.0a in Section 15? It's been suggested otherwise, the basis being that we're supposed to reproduce the *exact text* of the sources copyright. My feeling is that the "use any version of the license" sets the standard as to be the one I am actually using myself, and examples I already know of follow suit.
Second, and more troubling... A source I'm drawing from has the following S15 entry: [Product Name] and the above designated Product Identity are Copyright [Year], [Publisher]. [Names removed to protect the guilty...] Now, is it just me, or is there a problem with putting this line into my material? After all, the "above designated Product Identity" is going to be *my* Product Identity, and I don't see this line doing anything except causing issues. Yes, I have sent emails. No, I have not gotten a reply. Now I'm half-tempted to hit all the publisher forums I know (ENWorld, Mortality, WotC d20 page, etc.) and just post a "public announcement" that I'm removing the stupid part for obvious reasons. As a free download, I can change it at a moment's notice should the offending parties ever get an inkling to contact me, although the fact that I *know* I'd be doing it has held my hand back on the issue, so to speak. Thoughts and opinions on this? ~Jimmy Domsalla qtgg.icehex.net _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
