If you license artwork using a non-OGL license, and you publish it in an OGL'd work should you:

a) declare it as the licensor's PI (on the grounds that the owner has given you the implied authority to note that their product is protected)

b) note that it is outside the scope of the license since you are neither the owner of the  art and you are also do not possess the rights to declare it as OGC

Are the answers changed if the owner of the art gives you permission to declare it as PI?

The OGL seems to require that the owner of the PI carry out the PI declaration, but the general question is whether someone acting on behalf of the owner, directly or indirectly as the agent of the PI owner, can make the PI declaration.

Lee

_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l

Reply via email to