--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If you license artwork using a non-OGL license, and you publish it in an > OGL'd work should you: > > a) declare it as the licensor's PI (on the grounds that the owner has given > you the implied authority to note that their product is protected) > > b) note that it is outside the scope of the license since you are neither > the > owner of the art and you are also do not possess the rights to declare it > as > OGC > > Are the answers changed if the owner of the art gives you permission to > declare it as PI?
Just keep it out of your OGC declaration. ===== **************************************************************** "Let me be clear: Analysts differed on several important aspects of these programs and those debates were spelled out in the [national intelligence] estimate [of october 2002]. They never said there was an imminent threat. " -- CIA director George Tenet, 2/5/2004, Georgetown University **************************************************************** ""Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised. . . . The terrorists could fulfill their stated ambitions and kill thousands or hundreds of thousands of innocent people in our country or any other." -- "President" George Bush, 3/17/2003, 48-hour warning to Saddam Hussein **************************************************************** __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
