> Valid point. As with a lot of things, if you takeany position but the most-extreme (at either extreme), it is a somewhat-arbirtary position, often without objective support for why your position is valid and one just a little bit to either side of yours is not.
I dont know about arbitrary, but I agree with your point. How about instead of arbitrary we just say unsettled. I do believe my position is correct and is not arbitrary. I have what I believe is objective support for it. But reasonable minds can certainly differ on the topic and it is unsettled in that no one has said definitively what is right or wrong. (by the way, this is not to buy into the "scary grey area" debate, which I dont agree with, but simply to say that reasonable minds can differ on things and not be arbitrary in their positions or disagreements).
Fair enough. Sounds like a semantic issue to me, but if you prefer "unsettled", i'm ok with it. I was just going for "no one, absolute, incontrovertible, objective truth".
--
woodelf <*>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webpages.charter.net/woodelph/
I'm not poor, I just own a very select group of money. Only the crispest bills and clinkiest bits of change are fit to grace my pockets. --Paul Mather _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
