--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > You said, and I quote: "These definitions are not > limited to only game > companies, game lines, or any companies that are > involved with the OGL. Read what it > says, and you will see that you are misinterpreting > this. You will notice > that the definition of Product Identity does not > refer to the OGL, or any process > of declaration under it." > > You further said: "Ok....if you read the definition > of "Product Identity" in > section 1 (Definitions) you will see that there is > no burden of proof or > burden of declaration." > > > You'll see that I have actually quoted you quite in > context. You have > claimed point blank that there is NO REQUIREMENT to > have something declared as PI > for it to be PI. Period.
Then it would appear that the matter is just that you either cannot read or are just too dense to be able to interpret what others are saying. Never once have I said that there is no requriement, and those quotes that you are providing don't say that either. > Thanks for saying so. As I quoted you twice above, > on RPG.NET you said > otherwise. Then I tried to ask the membership a > question about contract law and > contractual construction (regarding third party > beneficiaries) and you have > claimed I'm misquoting you and lying about you. > Well, I just quoted you twice > above, in context, saying that there was no burden > of declaration, and then > quoted you once right after saying that there was a > burden. And, no...you did not quote any such thing. My statements that a definition of Product Identity is in the OGL had nothing to do with declaration of PI. They are in conjunction with that. I have never once said that there is no requirement for a declaration of PI because (having read the OGL) I know that it says that one is required. I am saying that the OGL says that that declaration is not the only requirement for something to be PI. It is interesting that you would say that I have stated this, because all of this seems to stem from my quoting from WotC's list of PI from the current version of the OGL. Why exactly would I quote something like that if I felt there was no need for one? But I will again tell you to not put words into my mouth. > Tell Monte Cooke, Green Ronin, and Mongoose that > their sales are suffering because of the OGL. What does this have to even do with anything at hand? _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list Ogf-l@mail.opengamingfoundation.org http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
