<<
I can't prove this position, but it *seems* to me to be the intent of the licence. And if
that *is* the way that the licence operates there *must* be a third type of content. I>>
Um. First, the only point I've debated is that there is no third type of content WITHIN a covered work. Define a covered work. Everything in the covered work is either OGC or PI. Period. That's not an opinion. It is a definition. It is not an interpretation. It is a definition. OGC means "any work covered by this license" except the parts that are PI.
Now, we can argue about the definition of a "covered work". But once you have defined a "work" then the above definition says everything in that covered work is OGC or PI.
You may not be able to then include content in a covered work which is not OGC or PI.
But again, that just may mean that the content that isn't OGC or isn't PI may not be part of the covered work.
Lee
_______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list Ogf-l@mail.opengamingfoundation.org http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
