On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 08:33:03 -0700 (PDT) Clark Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But since Mongoose > > itself derived those elements in part from the > > public domain sources, > > how is one to determine whether or not Daniel's > > interpretation of, > > say, Firbolgs is safely public domain or breachedly > > Mongoose-derived? > > It seems pretty common sense to me that if they both > match the public domain inspired concept that there is > no problem.
But it seems to me that if they both match the public domain-inspired concept then Mongoose shouldn't have claimed "firbolg" as PI since they have no ownership grounds. Spike Y Jones _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list Ogf-l@mail.opengamingfoundation.org http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
