Spike Y Jones wrote: > On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 08:33:03 -0700 (PDT) Clark Peterson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> But since Mongoose >>> itself derived those elements in part from the public domain >>> sources, how is one to determine whether or not Daniel's >>> interpretation of, say, Firbolgs is safely public domain or >>> breachedly Mongoose-derived? >> >> It seems pretty common sense to me that if they both match the public >> domain inspired concept that there is no problem. > > But it seems to me that if they both match the public domain-inspired > concept then Mongoose shouldn't have claimed "firbolg" as PI since > they have no ownership grounds.
But they did. And now we have to deal with it (in any number of ways discussed on this list). Jim Butler, Brand Manager Bastion Press, Inc. www.bastionpress.com _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list Ogf-l@mail.opengamingfoundation.org http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
