> In a message dated 8/24/2005 9:35:29 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Nothing about the license allows it to apply disparately to WotC as > opposed to the rest of us.
Except that they are not a third-party and are the owners of the material from which all else is derived. This does create some disparity between them still needing to use the OGL in WotC works that include third-party material (Unearthed Arcana, etc.), but I don't know if it extends to something like Dragon, that is essentially an outsourced house organ where they pay to have those OGL articles included. To myself, a layman, there seems to be little technical difference between the two, but I also find it hard to believe that the license's originator has operated so long without realizing a discrepancy in their policy with regards to Dragon. Possible? Yeah. Likely? No. _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list Ogf-l@mail.opengamingfoundation.org http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
