From: "Tom Phillips" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> What aspects of it are unacceptable to the Open Gaming Foundation

1.  It is far too complex.

2.  It does not address the issue of the use of contributor's names

3  It does not allow for the creation of a "larger work" where one set of
copyrights is maintained under separate ownership, and a second set of
copyrights are maintained using the License.

Because it is based on the GPL, which is 100% viral (you cannot release a
program which is partly proprietary and partly GPL'd), it cannot be used
effectively in our industry.  The value of the "game" is often the least
valuable portion of a gaming product - the value of the "IP" is often the
most valuable portion.  Without providing for this separation, the concept
of Open Gaming would never work.

Ryan


-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org

Reply via email to