On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, Doug Meerschaert wrote:
> Ryan, an "FAQ" with just the common questions and your common answers would be
> perfect--even if it's only one question for now.
Exactly. A FAQ like the first few questions from:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/FAQ.html
> > For instance, my feeling is that the current usage terms
> > of the d20 trademark mainly serves to promote sales of
> > the PHB and belongs on a WotC website. While I think
> > promoting sales of the PHB via the d20 trademark is perfectly
> > fine, I also think the open gaming foundation should keep an
> > arms length from these activities.
>
> Kal, D20 is, from my POV, a great example of "how to make money with OGL."
I was suggesting that if the open gaming foundation wants to
be viewed as fair and impartial they shouldn't be directly
involved in this activity. Will independents and WotC competitors
be allowed to contribute material under OGL and then have the
foundation's website describe their trademark whose usage
terms serve mainly to promote sales of their products?
Apache is a well known "brand" and is promoted by the Apache
Foundation. But no one is directed to buy services from Collab.net
(Brian Behlendorf) to use the logo.
You're probably right and a clearer distinction on the website is
sufficient at this time.
Regards,
--Kal
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
