"Ryan S. Dancey" wrote:

> > Basically, no general interest mag is going to be able to exist and cover
> d20
> > in what we might think of as a normal manner.  That is a loss to the
> industry
> > not a gain.
>
> I disagree with your analysis.
>
> Take Dragon Magazine for example.  A 3rd party pubisher who wanted to
> produce Dragon Magazine, and replace all the "D&D" content with Open Game
> Content derived from the System Reference Document could do so easily.

[snip]

> Not only do I think it is possible, I believe (based on my inbox) that it is
> a virtual certainty that there will be more than one d20 focused magazines
> avaialble in the new year.

Neither of these are general interest mags, Ryan.

Justin Bacon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org

Reply via email to