|
I would have to disagree with your statement below
Maggie.. Microsoft's 'Shared Source' movement is not a sign of trouble, at least
not viewed as one by the many folks who work there in some capacity or another
(I have been contracting as a test at MS for 4+ years) Rather, MS is changing
its business model as it realizes the certainty of change in the software
market. MS is making the Xbox SDK (Developer Kit) available to just about every
game company in the world, either for free or at low, low, low cost.. To
encourage people to make games for the Xbox. MS knows the money for the gaming
market comes from licenses down the road, not from the hardware they are
releasing.. But folks will have to buy the hardware to use the games. Same plan
as WotC, requiring the use of PHB. Admittedly, the chances are very high that
someone will kludge together an Xbox emulator and be able to play the games
without the hardware, just as folks are starting to look at releasing d20
material that is stand alone.. Still, in a marketing viewpoint, both companies
will still benefit. In the case of MS, folks who pirate the games and use the
emulator will show the game to friends, some of which who will buy the system,
etc. Same with the RPG world.. if someone isn't interested in D&D, but
plays Cloak and Dagger, then discovers they like the d20 system, they may be
willing to try Star Wars, or CoC, etc..
Again, I don't see the software industry, or specifically
Microsoft, moving to Shared Source as a problem or sign of trouble.. rather, MS
has found other ways to make money that will not draw scrutiny to them.. such as
the Passport system they have developed, or the .Net crap they are pushing..
They are simply trying to make sure that the Windows OS remains the top choice,
and by making sure all the good dev guys write code for it, even if they steal
some of the mystical pie, they still get dominance in the market and still pull
in more money from other apps they release.
-Just my thoughts, as I am a minion of the Dark
Empire
-Rob
|
- RE: [Ogf-l] "Shared-Source" Lynn Fredricks
- Re: [Ogf-l] "Shared-Source" Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Ogf-l] "Shared-Source" Reginald Cablayan
- Re: [Ogf-l] "Shared-Source" Skywise
- RE: [Ogf-l] "Shared-Source" Brad Thompson
- Re: [Ogf-l] "Shared-Source" Margaret Vining
- Re: [Ogf-l] "Shared-Source" John Nephew
- Re: [Ogf-l] "Shared-Source" Skywise
- Re: [Ogf-l] "Shared-Source" Margaret Vining
- Re: [Ogf-l] "Shared-Source" John Nephew
- Re: [Ogf-l] "Shared-Source" Rob Lowry
- Re: [Ogf-l] "Shared-Source" Damian
- Re: [Ogf-l] "Shared-Source" Rob Lowry
- RE: [Ogf-l] "Shared-Source" Patrick McCuller
- RE: [Ogf-l] "Shared-Source" Brad Thompson
- RE: [Ogf-l] "Shared-Source" Patrick McCuller
- Re: [Ogf-l] "Shared-Source" Damian
- RE: [Ogf-l] "Shared-Source" Brad Thompson
- Re: [Ogf-l] "Shared-Source" FrogGod
- Re: [Ogf-l] "Shared-Source" natalie & dave
- Re: [Ogf-l] "Shared-Source" Margaret Vining
