RE: [Ogf-l] SRD, Computer Junk, and Going Nuts...

[Brad Thompson]

> Michael Hahn
>
> Therein lies the rub. However, I don't consider, and I find it highly
> unlikely that a court would consider binary opcodes used in binary
> executables something that is even remotely human readable, and as such
> would not be considered for extraction of information from.

I agree with you but the issue is not extraction.  The binary is a
derivative of the source, and therefore must comply with the OGL just like
any other work.  The source code is a first-generation derivation of the
original OGC.  A binary is in effect a second-generation derivation of the
original OGC, and a first-generation derivation of the source.

-Brad

_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l