From: "Alec A. Burkhardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > And has anyone noticed that I'm not saying that the appendix with clause > statement doesn't qualify under the OGL? Honestly, I'm not sure what you're saying. But you seem to have said it a lot, and many different ways, so I assume tha fault lies with me. > To me it seems to only kinda, sorta clearly identify those portions > of the main text that contain OGC. I think it's as clear as the method S&S has already used. They listed what was PI/OGC on one page and left it up to the reader to remember that through the rest of the book. -Damian _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
