Right. But what i am trying to point out though is that the parts of D&D that were opened as OGC are being privately licensed to other parties with no OGC attached. Why can't we do the same thing? We are all using the same license right? We are all playing by the same rules?On 21 Aug 02, Infinite scribbled a note about Re: [Ogf-l] Publishing under the OG:Which is the point. Why is wizards alowed to treat there copyrighted material that way, but other people are not allowed to treat their own copyrighted material in the same way?In the example give (the one that started all this), the poster said that the ENTIRE document was released as OGC. That in itself will restrict their rights. By using the license, you are giving up certain rights in order to gain free rights to their material, and not have to re-invent the wheel so to speak....
Perhaps if you could let me know if there is a difference between the stuff I release as OGC and the stuff that wizards releases as OGC?
Have Fun,
Darren
