Sig: Matthew, with all due respect. Your ultimate series are mostly cut and paste exercises. I know you do edit the material, but not to a great extent. Most of the netbook feats you used were verbatem. There were a number of cases where two or three feats from different sources had the same mechanic. I don't fault you for it (happens to us too) but surely you mostly coppied and pasted from other sources. I don't think that's bad because it is a compelation which should be exactly that. Others just want to be able to use your books the way you used others books.
Sig: Others. My point before wasn't to say I like the Mongoose declaration of OGC. It was to say that if they play fast and loose with their declarations, they don't have much case to hasle you if you use their material in a fast and loose interpretation of what they declared. "Looks like it was derived from the SRD to me." Be vauge about what is OGC and what isn't and be prepared to have people publish your non OGC material as their own. BTW: Netbook of Feats is all OGC all the time! Take it all and wory not! From: "Matthew Sprange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The primary advantage of the OGL is that you can now cut&paste your way > to fame and glory. (A good example of this, caught by a reviewer, can be I have to respectfully disagree :) I love being able to use material from other people - but I do not believe that cutting and pasting to glory is really the right to think of it :) Or, looking at it another way, if that is what people here are really after from us, I have to wonder about their accusations of laziness. . . Matthew _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
