Faust said, "I am continuing to take discussion such as this and the lack of reaction from the community to mean that the designation "everything that is derivative of alreadyb open content" is becoming accepted industry standard."
The community of gamers may not react to it, but it seems clear that the community of publishers (as sampled on this list) have a reaction, and it's by-and-large a negative one. John Nephew said, "I find it vexing that my company has expended significant time and effort complying with the licenses, while other companies seem to have concluded that license compliance is a waste of time and effort that might otherwise be spent on dumping yet another new release on the market." Probably won't make much diff to your bottom line, but there are several of us that won't buy stuff that doesn't clearly mark the OGC and that tries to skirt the edge of compliance. Your efforts are appreciated by some of us. Lee said, "Asking for an OGC declaration that's unambiguous so that I can pay money for one of their products sounds like a completely fair trade, not unfair criticism." I agree. Not sure if a blanket statement as the sole OGC designator fits within the letter (let alone the spirit) of the license, but I know it's annoying. -Tom Caudron _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
