--- Matthew Sprange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [a lot] Really, I think the answers to Sigil's three questions would more than satisfy most of the people here. Whether or not they would agree with your answers, at least we would get an idea of your intent with your OGL declarations. I think that's what the last month of "mongoose bashing", if you really feel that's what 'we' were doing, was really about - answers to some fairly basic questions, this time with examples provided. Sigil did more work than he or any other consumer or publisher should have, but if that was what was necessary, oh well. Thanks Sigil.
I've only been published in a few works by other 'real' publishers, as you would put it, Matt. But I'm considering spending a lot more time preparing finished works for release under the OGL, possibly the d20STL. I see an industry that seems to be thriving, but is based on shadows and vagaries. Do I want to invest a substantial part of my time on that? Seems like a poor business decision from my perspective. I came to this list, and now have an even worse impression for the business and legal integrity of OGL-based publishers. While I have to admit that most of that has been caused by your refusal to answer questions simply posed, my negative impression is based also on the various levels of professionalism by other posters as well. I see problems here that are much more broad than simply your company. FWIW, I had no intent to antagonize you over this. But it's simply not worth any effort to decipher your meaning, unless you generously answer The Sigil's questions. I wish I had more to take away form this than a vague, biased and unfounded feeling of 'how not to do it'. -Mike __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
