On Thursday, November 18, 2010 10:45 AM, BM wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Garrett D'Amore<garr...@nexenta.com> wrote:
And to those of you running OI "in production", you're nuts. OI has had
exactly "one" release (of dubious quality), and has a sum total of a
half dozen engineers behind it; and I'm not sure all of them are
actually software engineers and not just integrators. I sure as heck
don't advocate illumos for production use *yet*, even though my own
desktop runs it. (Although I'm working hard to get it into a condition
when I will be happy to do so.)
1.
http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Frequently+Asked+Questions#FrequentlyAskedQuestions-WhatistherelationshipbetweenOpenIndianaandIllumos%3F
2. http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Available+IPS+Repositories — there
is a placeholder for http://pkg.openindiana.org/illumos
As of points are totally valid and OI should move to Illumos, yet
nobody went around to insult people called them "nuts" or "fools" (on
IRC), who made a mistake to use that super-buggy Nexenta, that was
constantly losing dependencies, screwing up APT and is based on a
prehistoric Debian repos. Maybe we also should join nexenta-dev@ and
yapping all the users are morons that using it, what you think? And
because of that never happend, Anil could do a great job, trying to
fix that stuff step by step.
It ain't Debian repos. Please don't drag Debian into this. It is the
crap from Ubuntu.
If I were you, I would apologize for this.
P.S. I don't really give a hoot about 151a or "too little / too late",
because some of our machines are running snv_127 and older, some of
them has even Solaris 8, which is old enough to get another "nut"
award. :-(
We don't give a hoot so long as we have a stable box and ZFS.
_______________________________________________
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
