Precisely. Cheers Dave
Bob Friesenhahn <bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us> wrote: >Availability of a graphical desktop is seen as a requirement for >common acceptance. Much/most of the graphical desktop development >taking place for Linux does not seem to be done by the companies which >popularly peddle it (e.g. Canonical has been more of a desktop >packager except for its useless Unity). > >The argument about "no commerical future" is becoming worn out and >tired since that (commercial purpose) is not why OpenIndiana/Illmos >users want to log into a graphical desktop. -- Sent from Kaiten Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
