Feel free to use this "skeleton" if it helps. https://bitbucket.org/gwr/os-net-skeleton
I've used it for things like this with some success, i.e. https://bitbucket.org/gwr/sgml2roff Gordon On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Garrett D'Amore < develo...@lists.illumos.org> wrote: > I will probably set up a seperate repo for this. I'd like it to be > buildable following the same pattern and tools as illumos itself in order > to minimize pain for distro builders. This would be the pattern that could > be used when ejecting other bits as well. Like the dhcp server. :-) > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 6, 2014, at 7:43 AM, Peter Tribble <peter.trib...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What part of the lp stack actually uses apache? I suspect it's only > ipp, mod_ipp specifically, and that the rest of the lp stack > has no dependency at all. I would be perfectly happy to see > all the ipp stuff ripped out (I've never used it, and my understanding > is that CUPS provides a much better implementation anyway) > especially if it allows us to eradicate apache-13. However., I'm not > sure that this extends to the rest of the legacy lp stack. > > The argument that legacy stuff could simply be dropped off to one > side in a legacy repo would be far stronger if we actually had > such a repo in place. I regard creating that infrastructure as a > necessary prerequisite to any significant pruning of the codebase. > > (Although I'm not sure it needs a full-blown repo. Tarballs of the > source that's ripped out, placed in a well-known location, ought > to be adequate.) > > > > > On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Garrett D'Amore < > develo...@lists.illumos.org> wrote: > >> I'd love to see it go. But I will wait for others to complain first. >> >> One idea would be to eject it from the gate and put it into a new repo >> where it could also be updated if people still want it. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On May 6, 2014, at 12:48 AM, "Alexander Pyhalov" < >> develo...@lists.illumos.org> wrote: >> > >> > Hello. >> > >> > When I tried to rebuild apache 1.3 again I found out that mod_ssl >> doesn't like OpenSSL 1.0. >> > Of course, I could look at it and try update it, but does someone >> really use apache 1.3? >> > Now it's only used as illumos-gate build dependency. >> > >> > Last time the question of removing print/lp* from the gate was rejected >> partially because cups didn't provide trusted printing support. >> > Our (OI /hipster) version of cups has TX patches. However, I haven't >> checked that it works. >> > As I understand, most distributions have already stripped this code. >> Isn't it a good time to reconsider the question - either update dependency >> to apache 2 or remove it? >> > -- >> > Best regards, >> > Alexander Pyhalov, >> > system administrator of Computer Center of Southern Federal University >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------- >> > illumos-developer >> > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182179/=now >> > RSS Feed: >> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182179/21239177-3604570e >> > Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?& >> > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com >> >> >> ------------------------------------------- >> illumos-developer >> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182179/=now >> RSS Feed: >> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182179/21175229-59db2a15 >> Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?& >> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com >> > > > > -- > -Peter Tribble > http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/ > > *illumos-developer* | > Archives<https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182179/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182179/21175074-7782178a> | > Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21175074&id_secret=21175074-3254433f>Your > Subscription > <http://www.listbox.com> >
_______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev