On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Nikola M <minik...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 07/19/16 12:05 PM, Michael Schuster wrote: > > Hi all, > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Jim Klimov <jimkli...@cos.ru> wrote: >> >> > behalf of OI developers the adoption of an OpenIndiana Code of >> >> Conduct. The draft text for this new document can be found >> >> at http://www.openindiana.org/community/code-of-conduct/. >> >> >> [...] >> >> >> > >> >You put things on discussion and editing before putting them on site. > > > perhaps, to help avoid (further) confusion or misapprehension, the draft could be named as such, eg http://www.openindiana.org/community/code-of-conduct-draft/ (and the current link removed until a final version is reached)? Plus, make it much clearer in the document that it's a draft. > > > It's not just about saying "it's draft". That does not solves the problem. > > No unfinished half-things should be put on site like this. > > It is about editing and decision process. > > No body made it a document suitable to be put on site, so it should'nt be there, but on Wiki to be edited and discuseed etc. > > It's a process not an act. > >
For instance in this response: "No unfinished half-things should be put on site like this." Is this a decision that needs decided still? Is there a consensus in any direction that http://www.openindiana.org/community/ is for drafts or not for drafts? I get that the support docs had a new complete format and required possibly a different type of server but this stuff is just text. I also like mailing lists and hate wiki talk pages.
_______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
