Hello, any more comments on this?
http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Code+of+Conduct+proposals <http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Code+of+Conduct+proposals> - Modified proposed version http://wiki.openindiana.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=31391953 <http://wiki.openindiana.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=31391953> - Nikola’s version Cheers, Adam > On Jul 27, 2016, at 12:47 AM, Aurélien Larcher <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > À mar. juil. 26 20:49:56 2016 GMT+0100, Michael Kruger a écrit : >> On 07/26/2016 09:58 AM, WebDawg wrote: >> >>> >>> For instance in this response: >>> >>> "No unfinished half-things should be put on site like this." >>> >>> Is this a decision that needs decided still? Is there a consensus in any >>> direction that http://www.openindiana.org/community/ is for drafts or >>> not for drafts? I get that the support docs had a new complete format >>> and required possibly a different type of server but this stuff is just >>> text. >>> >>> >>> I also like mailing lists and hate wiki talk pages. >> >> >> Hi WebDawg, >> >> I am not aware of a formally established process for submitting draft >> documents for consideration. For the purpose of discussing such a >> document, conceivably, it could have been hosted anywhere (www, wiki, >> google docs, github gist, etc.), or not hosted at all (e.g. the entire >> text sent as a post to the mailing list). >> >> As I understood it, the original idea was for people to view the >> document and submit comments via the mailing list. >> >> I don't believe it was ever intended for anyone but the original authors >> to directly edit the document as hosted on the www site. > > Indeed, the website being intended for publication only, the initial proposal > was meant to serve as reference for discussion on the mailing list first. > > Editable versions on other media (like the wiki) from the discussion could be > then created as the discussion moved forward. > > But in any case, the reference should still be available and unmodified so > that any participant can evaluate the differences/improvements. > > Basically ... what Michael said. > >> >> As for alternate proposals, comments, etc., they could have been >> delivered in any form (IRC, mailing list, github gist, etc). >> >> The need to provide an editable version of the document to be directly >> edited by community members wasn't (I don't believe) ever considered. >> >> Michael >> >> _______________________________________________ >> oi-dev mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev >> <http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev> >> > > -- > Thanks for sailing Jolla :) > _______________________________________________ > oi-dev mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev > <http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
