Thanks for the explanations Larry, It is what I was guessing.

Disclaimer: I'm totally pedantic at work ;)


On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 8:01 PM Larry Gritz <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Nov 9, 2017, at 8:00 PM, Thomas Mansencal <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> The fact it is backward incompatible raised to me the question of OIIO
> versioning scheme. What is the current approach since it does not seem to
> follow semantic versioning?
>
>
> I think for the pedantic, "semantic versioning" has three levels of
> release with numbering MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH:
> MAJOR: changes that can break APIs arbitrarily
> MINOR: changes that can add new API, but not break old API
> PATCH: bug fixes only, not even additions of new calls
>
> On OIIO, we roll both bug fixes and low-risk non-breaking additions into
> the minor releases (1.7.7 vs 1.7.8), never have true "bug fix only"
> releases. But we religiously adhere to the distinction that
> back-compatibility changes can only happen for major releases (1.8 vs 1.9).
>
> Anything goes in master, it's not a release branch at all yet -- that's
> where we can make big changes, including breaking APIs, as we are doing
> here. Every several months, we branch a new (major) release branch from
> master.
>
> Now that I'm writing this, I realize that I've been sloppy in the
> following way: I call 1.7 -> 1.8 a major release and 1.2.3 -> 1.2.4 a minor
> release. But if you look in oiioversion.h, it calls the first digit
> MAJOR_VERSION and the second digit MINOR_VERSION. So the nomenclature
> doesn't match. I'm not proud of this, but I'm worried that it's needlessly
> disruptive to change it all for the sake of pedantry. In all practical
> senses, we make the same distinction between API-breaking releases (major)
> and non-breaking releases (minor), and that's the important principle. We
> just don't assign the digits the same way as true Semantic Versioning (TM).
>
> --
> Larry Gritz
> [email protected]
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oiio-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>
_______________________________________________
Oiio-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org

Reply via email to