On 1/1/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/31/05, Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Now I'm not that much of a Maven guy, and given the troubles that the > > jakarta commons guys had/have, I'd rather avoid Maven 1 (Maven 2 might be > > worth checking out though). > > To be fair, the Commons problems are with the multiproject concept in > Maven. Provided you're not trying to be too customised, Maven 1 works > very well for a single project/jar.
I didn't want to discredit Maven, but then again OJB does some special things in its build file which probably won't work with pure Maven, and I do not really want to write Maven plugins. > > WDYT, should I try to integrate Ivy into OJB ? > > From what I understand, the Maven 2 Ant libs are a better option. > Someone's blog (ie could be wrong) suggested they would be rolled into > a future version of Ant. My motivation would be that we don't have to put the jars in the repository/source dist, and in the Eclipse classpath file. Will Maven2 be able to do this as well ? regards, Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
