Thomas Dudziak wrote:
On 1/1/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/31/05, Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now I'm not that much of a Maven guy, and given the troubles that the
jakarta commons guys had/have, I'd rather avoid Maven 1 (Maven 2 might be worth
checking out though).
To be fair, the Commons problems are with the multiproject concept in
Maven. Provided you're not trying to be too customised, Maven 1 works
very well for a single project/jar.
I didn't want to discredit Maven, but then again OJB does some special
things in its build file which probably won't work with pure Maven,
and I do not really want to write Maven plugins.
In Maven 2, there is an Ant-pluging. Maybe we can take advantage of it
for the special OJB needs.
WDYT, should I try to integrate Ivy into OJB ?
From what I understand, the Maven 2 Ant libs are a better option.
Someone's blog (ie could be wrong) suggested they would be rolled into
a future version of Ant.
My motivation would be that we don't have to put the jars in the
repository/source dist, and in the Eclipse classpath file. Will Maven2
be able to do this as well ?
Yep. Maven2 is able to build an eclipse project:
http://maven.apache.org/eclipse-plugin.html
HTH,
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
