Thomas Dudziak wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, eric barbe wrote:
Hi,
Honestly, I did not test Hibernate, I only read the documentation. Hibernate works the other way around from OBJ for modeling the XML. What I saw for string list is this : <set name="names" table="NAMES"> <key column="GROUPID"/> <element column="NAME" type="string"/> </set> It seem's simply. You give the "name" property, then the "table" name and the field (or element here) type.
I think that Hibernate is wrapping each java object naturally.
Regards
Eric
PS : see this link http://www.hibernate.org/hib_docs/reference/html/collections.html#collection s-s1-3
Unless I'm mistaken this seems to be something that OJB is not capable of, at least not directly. In OJB, the elements of collections have to have a class descriptor in the repository descriptor whereas Hibernate seems to also have the notion of "primitive" elements.
Yes, with OJB you would have to write a simple Wrapper class that is declared as element-class in the collection-descriptor.
questions to the users: Do we need a feature to simplify the storage of primitive types?
cu, Thomas
Tom
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
